Piloting

It’s a sad thing, but the lovely Airbus A380 can’t use Cape Town International Airport. Given that we can fill a couple of Emirates 777s and two BA 747s each day (plus Lufthansa, Turkish Airlines, Swissair, Singapore Airlines, Ethiopian Airlines, Air France and Qatar flights), there’s definitely passenger demand for big planes. It’s just that, apparently, the taxiing bits twixt the main runway and the building where the people get off aren’t wide enough… or something.

That’s not to say that A380s haven’t visited the skies above Cape Town. Lufthansa brought theirs down here in 2011 [photos] to publicise their flights to… er… Joburg. And BA followed suit 2½ years later to get some shots to let people know about their new A380 service to… er… also Joburg. They went all over the general Cape Town area in G-XLED, even “buzzing the tower” at CTIA, but they couldn’t land.

No such issues for G-XLEC and pilot Captain Dave Wallsworth, who I am now following on Twitter. He flew all the way from Singapore to London Heathrow yesterday and he took this shot on final approach to runway 27R at LHR.

CbSDRvLW8AQy3W-

It looks a bit like a videogame , doesn’t it? It’s probably more difficult than that though. Probably.
I’m not sure how much Captain Dave and his co-pilot actually have to do to get the plane safely down onto the ground by this point, but given that I haven’t heard anything about a massive crash at the London airport, I’m guessing that he was able to happily and safely snap this sort of thing without too much of an issue.

For the record, BA now have 11 A380s, the latest one having been delivered earlier this month.

None of them will be coming to Cape Town any time soon.

UPDATE: Or will they…?

Fullscreen capture 2016-02-16 122700 PM.bmp

Woohoo!

Coincidence?

DA leader Mmusi Maimane makes “a keynote speech” on Race and Identity in his party and in South Africa, and suddenly Twitter is “mysteriously” unavailable?

Fullscreen capture 2016-01-19 102748 AM.bmp

Could it be that the ANC have blocked access so that no-one was able to hear or engage with this landmark address?

Fullscreen capture 2016-01-19 103820 AM.bmp

Probably not, to be honest.

UPDATE: Still, the fact that this was a worldwide outage hasn’t stopped some people (namely Mmusi’s wife) from thinking the worst:

Do you really think they’re that bothered? Really?
Eish. Bit of a stretch.

We Asked Max Power How He Got His Name And You Won’t Believe Who Replied!

His Mum. It was his Mum who replied.

Yesterday’s post about Wigan Athletic footballist Max Power was a big hit. I honestly thought that I had somehow gained some insight into the process involved in naming him. But what’s the point in honest thought or indeed any sort of speculation when you can get answers straight from the horse’s mouth footballer’s twitter account?

Thus, I asked. And waking up, 6000 miles from civilisation… and ever so slightly further from Birkenhead, I found a reply – from Max’s Mum!

Fullscreen capture 2016-01-14 084643 AM.bmp

First off, fair play to Mrs P for responding. Presumably she monitors tweets sent to her son after important games, on the lookout for unjustified nastiness directed his way. The ones I saw on there yesterday seemed to be mainly friendly (like mine was), so maybe she had some extra time (unintentional football pun) to get back to me. Thanks for that.

Secondly 11lbs 4oz? Christ on a moped. That’s 5.103kg! So yeah, you can name him what you want after that kind of effort.

Max seems like a nice guy too. His rather errant shooting in the warm up on Tuesday resulted in him hitting a young fan behind the goal. And then this happened:

Anyway, any further confusion over the Max Power nomenclature saga seems now to have come to an end. We now know that he was named after his Mum, and not the family labrador. And that he was booked in the 87th minute of Tuesday’s game. Which finished 3-3.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, takes us full circle.

UPDATE: Except to say that Maxine did get back once again to tell me that they had a labrador named Max.


Fullscreen capture 2016-01-15 093658 AM.bmpLegend.

Twitter name

I can be found @6000 on twitter. While my twitter name generally works nicely for me (ties in with name of blog, doesn’t take up too many of your valuable 140 characters etc), there are a few drawbacks of having a numerical username. Occasionally, on some clients, twitter gets confused and thinks I am a teenage girl somewhere in the mid-west USA. I don’t really know how twitter works, but I believe that for computing purposes, each account on there has a number assigned to it. Presumably, this early adopter – I forget her name – was the 6000th person to sign up for twitter. Therefore (usually with DMs), she sometimes gets mistaken for me. Or I for her. Whatever – it’s a glitch. And it doesn’t happen very often.

What does happen often are heights, revs and prices. And I get inadvertently tagged quite a lot.

Hikers and climbers – outdoor types – are always tweeting about their hiking and climbing achievements, most especially their delight at taking a photo “@6000 feet”. Because they are using the imperial system, these people are usually in the USA. After all, if you are “@6000 metres”, you have other things to concentrate on, like not dying.
Another niche hobby is car stuff, and there is apparently some value in sharing the torque value of your car “@6000 rpm”. I’m aware that this doesn’t cost a lot (after all, “torque is cheap”) (no, YOU bugger off), but still, I’d guess that the bigger your number, the better your car. I get to hear quite a lot about people’s torques.

I’m always ever so impressed.

However, by far the most common inadvertent @6000 tag is pricing. Selling stuff on twitter “@6000” seems to be most popular in India (commercial property), Indonesia (jewellery) and Nigeria (anything and everything). These sellers are particularly pertinacious in their mission to get their goods sold, and thus, I have to block them. Not because they mean any harm, but because the same accounts seem to sell a lot of things for the same price, which (confirmation bias hat on) is generally “@6000”. That said, while they are persistent, they’re not always willing to do much more than tell you what they’re selling. Literally, just that. It can result in some initially mystifying, but somehow satisfyingly ridiculous mentions:

Initially, you wonder if you have been dragged into some world of secret espionage. Is this code for something? Are you supposed to reply with:

“Yes, but only when the geese fly south for the winter”?

(Which of course, Cape Town geese don’t.)

And then it strikes you. It’s nothing so exciting. Wunmi is just trying to make a living. You just happened to share a common number with her dual-function school bags. On wheels.

They sound very useful. And with a price tag of just “@6000”, it’s a remarkably good offer – you should get one.

June loadshedding rumours aren’t true

Eskom has let us know that the message spreading on social media (basically Facebook), that there will be twice daily routine loadshedding from next week, isn’t true:

e1 e2 e3

Several keyboard warriors individuals replied to these tweets with swearing and insults, the combination of which cut the nation’s power usage by 10% and assisted hugely with hastening the completion of the Medupi Power Station, thus negating the need for any loadshedding whatsoever.

Jokes. It didn’t really. Angrily typing some crap on your keyboard and sending it to a public relations lady sitting at a keyboard somewhere else doesn’t actually save electricity or speed up infrastructure provision.

But do keep trying, won’t you? It’s such fun to watch.