I don’t often reproduce other people’s work in full on here, but after I wrote this, it was nice to see that I’m not the only person feeling that way. Here’s Duncan White in the UK’s Sunday Telegraph
It is wrong to equate Angola with South Africa after Togo attack
It was grimly predictable. No sooner had the first reports of the shooting in Cabinda begun to filter through than South Africa’s ability to host a safe World Cup was called into question
What a laughable leap of logic, what reactionary racist rubbish.
It seems almost insulting to have to make the distinction between what happened in Angola and the security situation in South Africa but with banal parallels being so blithely drawn, the organisers of the World Cup have had to defend themselves. This is ludicrous.
It seems there was a lack of communication between Caf, African football’s governing body, and the Togolese federation about the team’s movement. At least, that’s what the political buck-passing indicates. The terrorists did not have any problems locating the Togolese convoy. Caf needs to prove they did not underestimate the dangers Cabinda presented when scheduling games there and that they had appropriate security measures in place. But, ultimately, it is impossible to prevent acts of terrorism taking place.
Since Munich in 1972, sport has been the target of terrorist attacks. After the Sri Lanka cricket team were fired on in Lahore last year, Arsène Wenger predicted that international sports events would increasingly become the target of terrorists. He has been proved right.
The infuriating flaw is when people equate an act of terrorism with a wider sense of African danger. There it is, the creeping stereotype about the “dark continent” and its propensity for violence. Shouldn’t we take the World Cup back to safe old Europe?
Terrorist attacks occur everywhere. We had one in the United Kingdom on Friday when a bomb went off under the car of a police officer in Northern Ireland. Yet because this attack happened in Africa, it gets translated into a general continental problem, rather than one relating to a specific exclave of a specific country.
Angola and South Africa are miles apart. Quite literally: the capital Luanda is 1,500 miles from Johannesburg, the distance between London and Moscow. Angola only emerged from a brutal 27-year civil war in 2002 and while it has enjoyed huge economic growth in the last eight years, it still bears the scars. It has the highest infant mortality rate in the world and the second-highest death rate in the world. The median age is 18.
South Africa is vastly more developed and has a track record of hosting major international events, especially sporting events. As Danny Jordaan, the chief executive of the 2010 World Cup, has pointed out, a war in Kosovo did not mean the German World Cup was called into jeopardy.
South Africa has its problems, especially the rate of violent crime. During the Confederations Cup last summer, you felt many people waiting for something serious to go wrong. Nothing did. The job of ensuring the World Cup passes with as few incidents as possible is a big one. Let’s not burden South Africa with the responsibility for Cabindan terrorism too.
Brilliantly put. One has to wonder why the local news fails to notice this sort of article in the international press, but readily and happily reproduce bigoted, negative rubbish.
Thanks to my Dad for the heads up.
