Jacques puts matters straight

I’m only an occasional reader of the Mail & Guardian, but when I do give myself the opportunity and can find the time, it’s generally an interesting read. Last week I was rather shocked and disappointed by Andile Mngxitama’s column “The face of white supremacy” in which the writer accused Gareth Cliff of being racist for – as far as I could work out, anyway – no apparent reason save for his own desperation to call somebody (white), a racist.
I should also say that if was not just the content of the column, but also Nic Dawes’ decision to publish such nonsense that left me feeling a little bewildered.

When I raised the matter on twitter, I wasn’t the only one finding myself in that mindframe: the erudite Jacques Rousseau informed me that he had written a rebuttal to Mngxitama’s column, (which would be far more articulate than anything I could ever write) and which he hoped would be published this week.

Well, it was, and it is brilliant. A perfect mix of rationality and justified ridicule, all dished up with a garnish of mild sarcasm:

Of course, Mngxitama’s argument relies on something called “anti-racist decoding”. I regret that I’ve never drunk as deeply from the well of postmodernism as Mngxitama has, because this decoding appears to fall outside of my sphere of competence, leaving me with only the suspicion that he’s talking nonsense.

I would heartily recommend a read of it if you can get hold of some dead tree. (But then I would say that, because I am white.)
I’ll put the link up as soon as it is available online. Here it is.
If it was up already, no-one would buy the paper, see?

5 thoughts on “Jacques puts matters straight

  1. Glad you liked it. I imagine that A.M. must now believe me to be Hitler. Or a garden gnome – one never can tell what these identity-politics types will come up with.

  2. Would be fun, but I doubt it – what could he really say, besides calling me a racist, and using my column as (circular) further evidence that he was right about Cliff (whites, more generally). But I’ll probably get lots of abuse once it appears in the M&G online.

  3. Jacques > We need someone black to agree with you. Where’s Sipho Hlongwane when you need him? (EDIT: Or Khaya Dlanga – hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!)
    Talking of which, do you have a hard copy of the paper – see what I mean about the (possibly slightly engineered) letters on Pg 32?

    Leave a Reply