Cyclists must now “stay alive at 1…”

Ooh. Cyclists. My favourite people.

The new cycling laws come into force in the Western Cape today, and the biggie is that, as a driver, you must allow at least 1 metre between the side of your vehicle and any cyclist or you will be a criminal. I’m not sure that this will make cyclists feel any safer, given that people generally completely disregard any other traffic laws with impunity anyway.

I’ve done a handy PDF version of the new regulations for you.

Quite what happened to the mantra of “Cyclists stay alive at 1.5”, I’m not sure. Presumably, around 33% more cyclists will not be making it safely back from their ride now. Obviously, this is sad.

Also, drivers are now allowed to cross a solid white line to pass a cyclist as long “it is safe to do so”, which is a bit weird, because if it was safe to cross the solid white line, then there wouldn’t be a solid white line there, would there?

What is quite interesting is that there are some rules for cyclists included in the new regulations as well. Obviously, the cyclists are up in arms about this (the discussion on the new laws is taking place in the “Rant & Rave” section of the local cyclists forum), because they’ve been reminded of all the rules that they should have been obeying anyway.
Have you got a front and rear reflector on your bike? Didn’t think so.
In addition, predictably, the laws for motorists apparently don’t go far enough and the laws for cyclists are too strict, ill-thought out or just annoying. Sample quote:

I will no [sic] be complying with the provisions of this law which I feel do nothing to improve my safety.

Of course you won’t, because we can all pick and choose which laws we want to comply with, can’t we? Idiot.

No. Don’t be so silly, because what these new regulations do is reiterate the rules which both drivers and cyclists must abide by, reminding road users that everyone needs to be responsible for their own safety and the safety of others, and that can only be a good thing in the efforts to prevent unnecessary road deaths.

With that in mind, obviously, if a driver breaks the law, by, say, going withing 95cm of a cyclist, then you can report them by taking down their car registration number and informing the authorities.
Equally, when you see the lycra-clad peloton of cylists going through the red traffic lights at Kalk Bay six abreast on Sunday, you can… erm… you can… right. You can’t.

Hmm.

7 thoughts on “Cyclists must now “stay alive at 1…”

  1. Trivial things such as reflectors? Why even bother with those when our lycra clad friends can’t be bothered to use hand signals, do things such as stop at stop streets or red lights; or, god forbid, ride in a single line instead of abreast across an entire lane so they can engage in a pleasant conversation on a busy Saturday morning on the main road endangering everyone’s lives.

    Of course though, 1m will solve everything for both sides.

  2. Tara > Hey now, all the signalling, riding alongside each other and stuff (but not red lights stuff) is covered in the “new” regulations too.
    This doesn’t solve anything, but if the Western Cape hadn’t done anything, then the cyclists would all be whining.

    Just like they are now.

  3. So, cyclists ride at least 30cm from the curb to avoid potholes etc, motorists must then ride 1m from the cyclists. Bearing that in mind, will the DA be installing wider roads to deal with this or should motorists take turns riding in the middle of the road?

  4. Ha! Difference is Hubbers (as they like to call themselves) are cyclists who whine… and have an extremely snobbish attitude. “I spent a fortune on this bike so I can ride it however I want.” *sigh*

    Leave a Reply